Well, that was quick. There is a video available for this interview (it requires a Microsoft plug-in).
Here are a couple of links to news articles: KTVU and SFGate.
For the nerdy out there here is the dump:
mplayer -dumpstream
mms://a1870.v129487.c12948.g.vm.akamaistream.net/7/1870/12948/v0001/vod.ibsys.com/
2008/0429/16054866.200k.wmv
(the link runs off the page, so I had to split it)
As I had feared, the verdict was based, in a large part, to Hans Reiser’s bizarre behavior and the fact that the jurors did not like him.
Threat Level also published the interview with the juror. http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2008/04/reiser-juror-de.html
What bothers me is this quote…
“It was a combination of things,” Dunn said. “The fact that he was able to get rid of the body. It’s something you do if you premeditate …”
It’s almost as if the jury wasn’t deliberating on whether Hans killed her, but rather whether it was premeditated. Almost as if they had already made up their mind that he had killed her long ago. What does this juror attribute that to?
“I was looking at his eyes,” the Oakland man said in a telephone interview. “He was faking it.”
Simply amazing.
If I’m ever on trial, I’m wearing sunglasses.